Last week the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in the Auriga Capital v. Gatz case, previously covered in this blog, affirming on contract grounds Chancellor Leo Strine’s finding of fiduciary breach by an LLC manager but dismissing as dicta his analysis that Delaware LLC managers owe traditional default duties of loyalty and care unless eliminated or modified in the operating agreement. It’s important, and it’s in this week’s New York Business Divorce.
Continue Reading Delaware Supreme Court Reboots Question of LLC Manager’s Fiduciary Duties

Last week’s New York Business Divorce looked at Auriga Capital v. Gatz in which Chancellor Leo Strine of the Delaware Chancery Court undertook a comprehensive analysis of LLC manager fiduciary duties under Delaware law. This week’s post takes a comparative look at New York LLC manager duties.

Continue Reading What Does Chancellor Strine’s Auriga Capital Decision Teach Us About Fiduciary Duties of New York LLC Managers? (Part Two)

In the first of a two-part series, this week’s New York Business Divorce looks at the Delaware Chancery Court’s important decision last month in Auriga Capital v. Gatz in which Chancellor Leo Strine, Jr. sets forth an analytic framework for imposition of fiduciary duties on managers of Delaware LLCs. Next week’s post will compare the law governing fiduciary duties of New York LLC managers.

Continue Reading What Does Chancellor Strine’s Auriga Capital Decision Teach Us About Fiduciary Duties of New York LLC Managers? (Part One)