Two recent Brooklyn decisions test the procedural boundaries of shareholder oppression—one rejecting a standalone damages claim outside dissolution, the other sending a properly commenced dissolution proceeding down a plenary path.
Continue Reading Brooklyn Cases Test the Procedural Boundaries of Shareholder Oppression
When shareholder oppression is real but dissolution is too much, should courts give majority owners a chance to straighten out before imposing the corporate death penalty?
Two recent cases, one from the Second Department and one from Suffolk County Justice Garguilo, shed light on some of the more nuanced issues in shareholder oppression litigation: the “equitable” prejudgment interest rate to be applied to a buyout under BCL 1118, and the relationship between a claim for dissolution and one for money damages.
Continue Reading Beyond Fair Value: When Shareholder Oppression Demands Interest and Damages
If an oppressed, frozen-out minority shareholder is going to sue for judicial dissolution, chances are they’re going to do it within the applicable six-year statute of limitations. This week’s New York Business Divorce examines a recent decision where the shareholder claiming oppression waited at least 10 years to sue.
Continue Reading When Is It Too Late to Sue for Shareholder Oppression?
There’s surprisingly little case law addressing disguised dividends as a basis for finding oppression of minority shareholders. This week’s New York Business Divorce looks at a recent Maryland court decision that does exactly that.
Continue Reading When Do Disguised Dividends Add Up to Minority Shareholder Oppression?
A recent First Department decision recognizing a cause of action for shareholder oppression raises big questions in the area of minority shareholders’ rights.
Continue Reading A New Stile: First Department Shakes Up the Shareholder Oppression Claim
You won’t want to miss this week’s New York Business Divorce featuring a recent decision in which the court found minority shareholder oppression based on “disrespectful and unfairly disproportionate treatment of a female shareholder by the male majority in a closely held corporation.”
Continue Reading Minority Shareholder Oppression in the #MeToo Era
It’s brother against brother in the case featured in this week’s New York Business Divorce, in which the court dismissed a petition to dissolve a real estate holding company based on alleged withholding of company information.
Continue Reading Shareholder Oppression Requires More Than Denial of Access to Company Information
If you’re looking for a good old-fashioned case of minority shareholder oppression, look no further than this week’s New York Business Divorce which examines Justice Richard Platkin’s recent decision in Matter of Digeser v Flach.
Continue Reading A Classic Case of Minority Shareholder Oppression
A recent decision by Justice Marcy Friedman draws attention to a somewhat rare breed of minority shareholder oppression involving the controlling shareholder’s repudiation of the petitioner’s stock ownership. It’s a case you won’t want to miss, in this week’s New York Business Divorce.
Continue Reading Is Denial of Shareholder Status Shareholder Oppression?