New York appellate case law invariably holds that a closely-held business owner lacks a direct property interest or right in the entity’s underlying real estate asset to support a Notice of Pendency. But in this week’s New York Business Divorce, we feature an uncommon motion court decision declining to vacate a Notice of Pendency placed by an LLC member upon the entity’s real estate asset to thwart the property’s sale to a third-party buyer. Is this recent decision an outlier, or the birth of an exception to the rule?
