February 2012

Justice Thomas Whelan, the newest member of Suffolk County Supreme Court’s Commercial Division, offers some important procedural guidance concerning dismissal motions in dissolution proceedings in a decision last month in Matter of Langella. It’s in this week’s New York Business Divorce.

Continue Reading A Question of Procedure: Are Merits-Based Pre-Answer Dismissal Motions Allowed in Dissolution Proceedings?

A lawsuit among siblings who co-own a business that owns and operates a boat yard is fodder for an interesting decision earlier this month by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Elizabeth Emerson in Gillette v. Sembler. The decision, which addresses the requirement for pre-suit demand for derivative claims, is featured in this week’s New York Business Divorce.

Continue Reading Family Feud Highlights Hurdles to Derivative Actions Against Close Corporation Directors

Last week’s New York Business Divorce looked at Auriga Capital v. Gatz in which Chancellor Leo Strine of the Delaware Chancery Court undertook a comprehensive analysis of LLC manager fiduciary duties under Delaware law. This week’s post takes a comparative look at New York LLC manager duties.

Continue Reading What Does Chancellor Strine’s Auriga Capital Decision Teach Us About Fiduciary Duties of New York LLC Managers? (Part Two)

In the first of a two-part series, this week’s New York Business Divorce looks at the Delaware Chancery Court’s important decision last month in Auriga Capital v. Gatz in which Chancellor Leo Strine, Jr. sets forth an analytic framework for imposition of fiduciary duties on managers of Delaware LLCs. Next week’s post will compare the law governing fiduciary duties of New York LLC managers.

Continue Reading What Does Chancellor Strine’s Auriga Capital Decision Teach Us About Fiduciary Duties of New York LLC Managers? (Part One)