Last week’s rulings by New York’s high court in the closely-watched Centro and Arfa cases resolves much of the uncertainty that has surrounded the ability of controlling owners of closely held companies to bargain for effective releases against fiduciary-based claims of non-disclosure when buying out minority owners. Get the full story in this week’s New York Business Divorce.
Continue Reading New York’s Top Court Resets the Bargaining Table When Controlling Owner of Closely Held Company Buys Out Minority Partner
Buyout
Rothko Damages Awarded for General Partner’s Undervalued Buyout of Limited Partners’ Interest in Realty Company
A recent decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, in Frame v. Maynard authorizes the imposition of so-called Rothko damages against a general partner who breaches fiduciary duty by misrepresenting the value of partnership assets when buying out the limited partners’ interests. Learn more in this week’s New York Business Divorce.
…
Continue Reading Rothko Damages Awarded for General Partner’s Undervalued Buyout of Limited Partners’ Interest in Realty Company
Bonding a Fair Value Award: When Can the Court Require It?
When the company or majority shareholder elects to purchase a dissolution petitioner’s shares for fair value, how can the selling shareholder be sure the purchaser will be able to pay the eventual award? The statute offers relief in the form of a bonding requirement, as illustrated in a recent case decided by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Stephen A. Bucaria. Get the story in this week’s New York Business Divorce.
…
Continue Reading Bonding a Fair Value Award: When Can the Court Require It?
Key Person Discount Takes Center Stage in Stock Valuation Proceeding
The key-person discount makes a rare but ultimately unsuccessful appearance in a fair value buyout proceeding triggered by a corporate dissolution petition filed by minority shareholders of an office copier sales and leasing company. The valuation report by Referee Louis Crespo, and the decision confirming it by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Barbara R. Kapnick, are featured in this week’s New York Business Divorce.
…
Continue Reading Key Person Discount Takes Center Stage in Stock Valuation Proceeding
Paul (Junior) Teutul Wins Appeal in American Chopper Buyout Lawsuit
No, it’s not Monday. Due to the tremendous public interest in the American Chopper litigation, New York Business Divorce is posting ahead of its normal schedule to let folks know about this week’s appellate decision handing victory to Paul (Junior) Teutul in his fight to resist a compelled buyout by his father of his minority stake in Orange County Choppers. Next posting: December 27, 2010.
…
Continue Reading Paul (Junior) Teutul Wins Appeal in American Chopper Buyout Lawsuit
Failure to Define Terms in Buyout Agreements Leads to Litigation Woes
What do three recent decisions by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the Appellate Division in Albany, and Nassau County Justice Ira Warshawsky have in common? They all involve disputes over poorly designed buyout agreements that fail to define critical terms. It’s in this week’s New York Business Divorce.
…
Continue Reading Failure to Define Terms in Buyout Agreements Leads to Litigation Woes
Court Hears Argument of Paul Jr.’s Appeal in American Chopper Buyout Dispute
Last week I stopped by the courthouse in White Plains to watch the oral argument of the appeal by Paul “Junior” Teutul of American Chopper fame from the lower court’s decision on which I previously reported, compelling him to sell his shares in the custom motorcycle business to his father and television co-star, Paul “Senior” Teutul. Get the full story in this week’s New York Business Divorce.
…
Continue Reading Court Hears Argument of Paul Jr.’s Appeal in American Chopper Buyout Dispute
50% Owner of AriZona Iced Tea, Claiming Shareholder Oppression, Files for Involuntary Dissolution of Multi-Billion Dollar Enterprise
Drinkers of AriZona Iced Tea will thirst for this week’s New York Business Divorce post on a dissolution petition filed last week in Nassau County Supreme Court by a 50% shareholder of the multi-billion dollar beverage maker headquartered in Woodbury, New York.
…
Continue Reading 50% Owner of AriZona Iced Tea, Claiming Shareholder Oppression, Files for Involuntary Dissolution of Multi-Billion Dollar Enterprise
Court Addresses Necessary Party, Res Judicata Issues in Shareholder Oppression Case Pitting Uncle Against Nephews
Must a corporate dissolution petition name all shareholders as respondents? Does the dismissal of a shareholder’s prior lawsuit asserting derivative and employment-based claims preclude his seeking relief as an oppressed minority shareholder? These are the questions answered in a recent decision by Justice Orin Kitzes in Matter of Adelstein (Finest Foods Distributing Co.), featured in this week’s New York Business Divorce.
…
Continue Reading Court Addresses Necessary Party, Res Judicata Issues in Shareholder Oppression Case Pitting Uncle Against Nephews
Decision Breaks New Ground in Dispute Over Enforcement of Stock Buyback Triggered by Filing of Dissolution Petition
A highly instructive decision by Westchester Commercial Division Justice Alan D. Scheinkman in Matter of Piekos (Home Studios Inc.) grabs the spotlight in this week’s New York Business Divorce. The question presented: Does the mere filing of a dissolution petition by an allegedly oppressed minority shareholder trigger a mandatory buyback of the petitioner’s shares at book value under the terms of the shareholders’ agreement?
…
Continue Reading Decision Breaks New Ground in Dispute Over Enforcement of Stock Buyback Triggered by Filing of Dissolution Petition