One might assume that pending legal matters at the time of a law partnership’s dissolution are firm assets or property. Not so, held the New York Court of Appeals in a ruling that practically guarantees prolonged litigation over the correct valuation and allocation of contingency fee cases when law partnerships dissolve. Read about one recent example in this week’s New York Business Divorce.

Continue Reading Do Contingency Fee Law Firm Partnership Breakups Take the Prize for Most Difficult to Resolve?

Is it a partnership? Is it an LLC? Can it be both? In this week’s New York Business Divorce, read about a novel application of the rules of law governing partnerships and LLCs to the same business entity simultaneously to achieve a solution that would not been possible if strictly applying the laws of one or the other.

Continue Reading An LLC Masquerading as a Partnership

Every so often a case comes along that reads less like a business dispute and more like a cautionary tale about the perils arising out of unwritten deals among friends. As we’ve written about before, these cases can be brutal to defend, particularly where the pleadings just robust enough to survive a motion to

While the distinction between a partner and an economic interest holder is conceptually sound, a recent decision from the Second Department shows how an assignee of an economic interest can be left not only out of the boardroom, but also out in the cold financially.

Continue Reading Ownership Without Partnership: A Lesson from the Second Department on the Plight of the Assignee

General partnerships are supposed to be the easiest of all business organizations for co-owners to separate. Not in the case featured on this week’s New York Business Divorce, where it took almost ten years for the majority partners of a New York general partnership to secure a court ruling that a formal written notice of withdrawal by one of the partners dissolved the business by operation of law.

Continue Reading The Pick-Your-Partner Principle

Strict compliance with contractual conditions precedent, yea or nay? In New York, it depends.

Now, the general rule is that strict compliance with contractual conditions precedent is required. The New York Court of Appeals has previously held: “Express conditions must be literally performed, substantial performance will not suffice” (MHR Capital Partners LP v Presstek,