Strict compliance with contractual conditions precedent, yea or nay? In New York, it depends.

Now, the general rule is that strict compliance with contractual conditions precedent is required. The New York Court of Appeals has previously held: “Express conditions must be literally performed, substantial performance will not suffice” (MHR Capital Partners LP v Presstek,

In this week’s business divorce follies, an imprecisely-drafted notice of default and cure letter leads to a stunning defeat for a group of limited partners who tried to remove a limited partner “for cause” under the partnership agreement.

Continue Reading No Unforced Errors Please: “For Cause” Removal Provisions Mean What They Say and Say What They Mean

In this week’s New York Business Divorce, a tip of the hat to retiring Justices Eileen Bransten and Charles E. Ramos with a look back at some of their more memorable business divorce rulings.
Continue Reading A Fond Adieu to Two Giants of the Manhattan Commercial Division Bench