Some business divorce cases are about money. Others are about control. Today’s case, Homapour v 3M Properties LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 04371 (1st Dept 2026), is about both.

As we often see with second and third generation closely-held family businesses, the informal trust and family hierarchy that may have helped build the enterprise

Litigation over who is—and who is not—a member of a limited liability company has become a defining feature of LLCs.  A recent First Department decision suggests a shift away from informality and back toward strict compliance with the contractual mechanics of admission.

Continue Reading Promise of Equity Falls to Operating Agreement’s Rigid Admission Requirements

Strict compliance with contractual conditions precedent, yea or nay? In New York, it depends.

Now, the general rule is that strict compliance with contractual conditions precedent is required. The New York Court of Appeals has previously held: “Express conditions must be literally performed, substantial performance will not suffice” (MHR Capital Partners LP v Presstek,

This week on New York Business Divorce, read about the interplay between statutory and contract rules for LLC manager removal or expulsion, set within an appeal from a trio of decisions we wrote about what feels like a lifetime ago.

Continue Reading How Easily Can an Operating Agreement Supplant the Default Rule for LLC Manager Removal? Pretty Easily.

This week’s New York Business Divorce features a failed attempt at removing restaurant manager on a preliminary injunction motion.

Continue Reading Bless This Mess: New York Court Shuts Down Attempted Early Ouster of Restauranteur From Managing His Own Restaurant

This week’s New York Business Divorce presents the 2025 Winter Case Notes, where we highlight a few recent decisions of interest featuring strict adherence to statutory language and the parties’ governing agreements.
Continue Reading Winter Case Notes: Nice Try, But the Agreements Say What They Say

In this week’s business divorce follies, an imprecisely-drafted notice of default and cure letter leads to a stunning defeat for a group of limited partners who tried to remove a limited partner “for cause” under the partnership agreement.

Continue Reading No Unforced Errors Please: “For Cause” Removal Provisions Mean What They Say and Say What They Mean

This week’s New York Business Divorce touches on familiar themes. A bitter father-son dispute. A disagreement over whether to sell or keep the business. An expulsion and compelled buyout. Throw in a fistfight, criminal charges, and an alleged extortion in exchange for reduced criminal charges, and you’ve got one heck of a sordid story. There’s even a legal lesson about the importance of strict compliance with closing deadlines in buy-sell option agreements.
Continue Reading Dollars, Donuts, and Buy-Sell Options