Photo of Peter J. Sluka

Peter J. Sluka represents individuals and entities in all phases of complex commercial litigation.  Peter focuses his practice on business divorce and intra-company disputes, including at mediation, arbitration, trial, and appeal. Regularly litigating in New York State and Federal Court, Peter handles all aspects of claims between owners of closely-held business entities, including disputes over business valuation, fiduciary duties, governing agreements, capital calls, dilution, shareholder oppression, and dissolution.

What happens when a law firm breakup combines self-help with firm funds, weaponized billing practices, a fatal deemed admission, and a federal court’s refusal to entertain dissolution? Ballon Stoll gives us the answer—and several cautionary lessons.…

Continue Reading Help Yourself to Firm Funds, Lose Your Shares by Admission, and Other Bad Ideas in a Law Firm Breakup

Two recent Brooklyn decisions test the procedural boundaries of shareholder oppression—one rejecting a standalone damages claim outside dissolution, the other sending a properly commenced dissolution proceeding down a plenary path.…

Continue Reading Brooklyn Cases Test the Procedural Boundaries of Shareholder Oppression

When shareholder oppression is real but dissolution is too much, should courts give majority owners a chance to straighten out before imposing the corporate death penalty?

 
 
 

…
Continue Reading Is it Time for Courts to Embrace Shareholder Oppression Outside of the Corporate Dissolution Context?

Litigation over who is—and who is not—a member of a limited liability company has become a defining feature of LLCs.  A recent First Department decision suggests a shift away from informality and back toward strict compliance with the contractual mechanics of admission.…

Continue Reading Promise of Equity Falls to Operating Agreement’s Rigid Admission Requirements

A recent Brooklyn Supreme Court case bring useful insight on three post-dissolution fundamentals: when (and how) a dissolution can be annulled, the court’s supervisory power under BCL 1008, and why, when shareholders are deadlocked as to dissolution procedure, a public sale—not a private deal—is the default endgame.…

Continue Reading Corporate Afterlife: Deadlock and Accounting in the Winding-Up Phase