This week’s New York Business Divorce highlights the contributions of the Nassau County Commercial Division Justices Stephen Bucaria, Ira Warshawsky and Timothy Driscoll to the body of business divorce case law, also featuring three of their recent decisions.

Continue Reading New Decisions of Interest by Nassau County’s Commercial Division Judges

The order to show cause is a critical document drafted by the petitioner’s counsel for signature by the judge when initiating a corporate dissolution proceeding. This week’s New York Business Divorce offers a drafting primer using some illustrative forms.

Continue Reading Dissecting the Order to Show Cause in Corporate Dissolution Proceedings

In a rare intersection of matrimonial and business divorce, last week the Appellate Division, Third Department, upheld the dismissal of an LLC dissolution proceeding brought by one spouse on the ground it was superseded by the other spouse’s prior-filed divorce action. But wait a minute; how can the court simply disregard the LLC as a separate entity? Read more in this week’s New York Business Divorce.

Continue Reading Court Decision Weds Business Divorce with Matrimonial Divorce

The Appellate Division, Second Department’s breakthrough decision in the 1545 Ocean Avenue case, in which the court redefined the standard for judicial dissolution of LLCs, recently marked its one-year anniversary. This week’s New York Business Divorce looks at several recent trial court decisions by Justices Warshawsky, Strauss and Pines in LLC dissolution cases to see how the new standard has fared.

Continue Reading The Emerging Influence of 1545 Ocean Avenue on Judicial Dissolution of LLCs

Professor Larry Ribstein recently published a highly informative paper called “Close Corporation Remedies and the Evolution of the Closely Held Firm” in which he relates the judicial dissolution remedy to the evolution of small business firms from partnerships to close corporations to the modern limited liability company. It’s essential reading for business divorce practitioners, and it’s in this week’s New York Business Divorce.

Continue Reading Larry Ribstein on the Evolution of the Closely Held Firm and Judicial Dissolution Remedies

A recent decision by Commercial Division Justice Bernard Fried addresses an interesting issue concerning demand requirements for derivative actions involving manager-managed LLCs. Learn more in this week’s New York Business Divorce.

Continue Reading May Majority Member of Managerless Manager-Managed LLC Maintain Derivative Action?

In Georgi v. Polanski, decided last month by Kings County Commercial Division Justice David Schmidt, the court addresses the right of a controlling LLC member to expel the non-controlling member upon his failure to comply with a capital call. It’s in this week’s New York Business Divorce.

Continue Reading Not a Capital Idea: Making Unauthorized LLC Capital Calls

In this second installment of a two-part series, New York Business Divorce examines recent First Department decisions clarifying the standards for overcoming general releases given in the context of transactions with fiduciaries in closely held business entities, where the plaintiffs allege that the fiduciary fraudulently induced them to enter into the transaction. This week’s focus is on a case whose name should be familiar to regular readers of this blog, Arfa v. Zamir, 2010 NY Slip Op 06070 (1st Dept July 13, 2010).

Continue Reading Recent Appellate Rulings Clarify Standards for Challenging Releases Given to Fiduciaries of Closely Held Business Entities: Part 2

This week and next, New York Business Divorce examines two recent First Department decisions clarifying the standards for overcoming general releases given in the context of transactions with fiduciaries in closely held business entities, where the plaintiffs allege that the fiduciary fraudulently induced them to enter into the transaction. This week’s focus is on Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v. America Movil S.A.B. de C.V., 2010 NY Slip Op 04719 (1st Dept June 3, 2010).

Continue Reading Recent Appellate Rulings Clarify Standards for Challenging Releases Given to Fiduciaries of Closely Held Business Entities: Part 1