New York appellate case law invariably holds that a closely-held business owner lacks a direct property interest or right in the entity’s underlying real estate asset to support a Notice of Pendency. But in this week’s New York Business Divorce, we feature an uncommon motion court decision declining to vacate a Notice of Pendency placed by an LLC member upon the entity’s real estate asset to thwart the property’s sale to a third-party buyer. Is this recent decision an outlier, or the birth of an exception to the rule?

Continue Reading For Close Business Owners, the Toothless Notice of Pendency Remedy Unexpectedly Gets Some Bite

Hoping to derive standing to sue from an LLC membership interest assignment? This week’s New York Business Divorce is another reminder that assignment of a membership interest does not convey actual membership status, with all the coveted legal rights flowing therefrom, unless the operating agreement grants the assignor such power, and, then, only where the assignor and assignee comply with all the conditions of the contract for admission of a new member. Anything less can result in total litigation defeat.

Continue Reading Mere Assignment of an LLC Membership Interest Does Not Make You a Member

“Except as otherwise set forth herein” is a common proviso in agreements of all sorts. It can provide clarity. It also can cause dispute, as in the case highlighted in this post.

Continue Reading A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Shareholder Agreement’s “Except as Otherwise Set Forth Herein” Hands Control of Famed Restaurant to Minority Shareholders

This week’s New York Business Divorce presents the 2025 Winter Case Notes, where we highlight a few recent decisions of interest featuring strict adherence to statutory language and the parties’ governing agreements.
Continue Reading Winter Case Notes: Nice Try, But the Agreements Say What They Say

In this week’s business divorce follies, an imprecisely-drafted notice of default and cure letter leads to a stunning defeat for a group of limited partners who tried to remove a limited partner “for cause” under the partnership agreement.

Continue Reading No Unforced Errors Please: “For Cause” Removal Provisions Mean What They Say and Say What They Mean