Strict compliance with contractual conditions precedent, yea or nay? In New York, it depends.

Now, the general rule is that strict compliance with contractual conditions precedent is required. The New York Court of Appeals has previously held: “Express conditions must be literally performed, substantial performance will not suffice” (MHR Capital Partners LP v Presstek,

You can’t have a business divorce without first having a business marriage.

Simple enough, right? But, a number of cases we’ve featured on this blog involve the central question of whether the parties, in fact, formed a business relationship… and the attendant difficulties in litigating those types of disputes. Specifically, in a post not too

In New York civil practice, appeals from non-final orders, called interlocutory appeals, have the awesome power to transform a case before its conclusion, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, and vice versa. Read about one such instance in this week’s New York Business Divorce.

Continue Reading Roller Coaster Ride: Interlocutory Appeals in Business Divorce Cases

This week’s New York Business Divorce showcases how courts reign in aggrieved limited partners whose demands stray from the plain terms of the limited partnership agreement
Continue Reading You Get What You Get, and You Don’t Get Upset: First Department Boots Limited Partner’s Claims Based on Plain Terms of Limited Partnership Agreement

In a split 3-2 decision last week, the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed an order dismissing a claim to enforce an oral buy-out agreement involving a Delaware LLC as barred by the merger clause in a subsequently amended operating agreement that the plaintiff never signed. Read about it in this week’s New York Business Divorce.
Continue Reading New York Appellate Court’s Split Decision Involving Delaware LLC Pits “Harsh” Contractarianism Against “Fundamental Fairness”